What it is
An ongoing advisory model for companies that need to keep priorities, evidence, controls and reporting moving after an assessment or under customer, audit and cyber insurance pressure.
An ongoing advisory model for companies that need to keep priorities, evidence, controls and reporting moving after an assessment or under customer, audit and cyber insurance pressure.
Problem
Many companies identify gaps and then return to urgency-driven execution. VIP Membership helps sustain a monthly cadence of improvement, follow-up and evidence without turning cybersecurity into an endless task list.
Findings and pending actions lose traction after the report.
The technical team needs prioritization and advisory support.
Customers, insurers or audits request updated evidence.
Leadership needs clear reporting, not isolated technical noise.
Solution
The membership organizes high-impact monthly actions, reviews priorities, supports execution and produces evidence or reports the company can use internally or with third parties.
Updated 30-60-90 plan.
Vulnerability management with prioritization and action plan.
Critical finding revalidation.
Executive reports and indicators for leadership.
In summary
An ongoing advisory model for companies that need to keep priorities, evidence, controls and reporting moving after an assessment or under customer, audit and cyber insurance pressure.
SMBs, startups, SaaS and fintechs under customer, audit, cyber insurance, growth or evidence pressure.
It does not promise total security, certification, audit approval, insurance approval or absence of incidents.
Monthly continuity
When the company needs monthly cadence, evidence follow-up and continuous prioritization, VIP works as the operating format to keep the roadmap alive.
Executive direction, risk judgment, leadership decisions and coordination with internal owners or vendors.
Monthly cadence with backlog, evidence, reviews, exercises and support based on agreed scope.
VIP does not replace the internal team or guarantee certifications, insurance approval or absence of incidents. Continuity works best when owners are defined and decisions are available.
The membership is organized into three reference levels. Final scope is defined based on criticality, available team and external pressure.
VIP Essential
Credits/month: 2 · Reference SLA: 48 h, critical 8 h
Best for startups/SMBs with an internal technical team.
VIP Growth
Credits/month: 4 · Reference SLA: 24 h, critical 4 h
Best for SMBs facing insurance renewal or upcoming audits.
VIP Elite
Credits/month: 8 · Reference SLA: same day, critical 2 h
Best for scale-ups or regulated companies with enterprise customers.
Trust reference
Talsoft supported Rivkin Securities in Australia through a six-month program to formalize its cybersecurity structure, including an ISO 27001-aligned ISMS, live risk register, incident response, centralized monitoring and external PenTest.
View Rivkin casePublished testimonials
Short references on professionalism, communication and support in cybersecurity work. Every project depends on its scope, context and objectives.
"Leandro and the team did a great job enhancing and formalising our existing security structure. The engagement was well-organised, consistently documented, and delivered to a high standard."
"They got involved in solving the problem and showed strong availability to help."
"Communication was fast and contacting Talsoft was easy."
"Excellent service, very professional, with fast and clear responses."
Testimonials are qualitative references. They do not imply guaranteed outcomes or replace a context-specific assessment.
Feedback patterns
Client comments reinforce a core idea: the value is not only finding risks, but explaining priorities, being available and turning findings into concrete next steps.
Feedback highlights audits and assessments that end with concrete workstreams and improvements to implement.
Comments repeatedly mention clear responses, fluid contact and easy coordination during the project.
Several comments value team involvement when there was operational pressure or an active security issue.
Feedback references detailed and clear reports that help business and technical teams understand what to do next.
Talsoft publishes qualitative patterns and short testimonials. Logos, metrics, architectures and sensitive details are not published without explicit authorization.
Free entry point
When booking, you complete a short questionnaire. Based on that input, Talsoft prepares a first read and a mini diagnostic report to orient the next step without over-scoping the decision.
We run a 30-minute conversation to understand timing, pressure, team capacity and business context.
We define a simple monthly plan with a small number of high-impact actions.
We execute, support and show progress with clear evidence.
Monthly priority plan.
Updated 30-60-90 roadmap.
Follow-up of vulnerabilities and critical findings.
Evidence for customers, audits or cyber insurance based on scope.
Monthly executive report.
Review of the next work cycle.
30 days: clearer priorities and owners.
60 days: fewer isolated urgencies and better available evidence.
90 days: more sustainable controls and next-quarter plan.
Better enterprise customer conversations.
More continuity after the Initial GAP Assessment.
Ongoing advisory without compliance guarantees.
Business impact
An assessment can show gaps. The membership is designed to help the company maintain an improvement sequence, close findings and sustain evidence without depending only on urgency.
Less dispersion across leadership, IT and vendors.
Better follow-up of risks and pending actions.
Evidence better prepared for third parties.
Greater ability to explain decisions and progress.
Not necessarily. If there is no previous assessment, the work starts simply and organizes initial priorities.
Yes. The modality is reviewed based on priorities, team availability and new requirements.
Yes, the focus is preparing evidence and clear reports. It does not guarantee approval, certification or compliance.
By progress in closing gaps, reducing exposure, available evidence, response times and executive clarity.
Yes, the initial call remains the starting point to understand context and next steps.
The first step is not buying another tool. It is understanding which risk exists, which evidence is missing and what decision should be made now.