Talsoft TS
Cross-cutting Maturity Program capability

AI governance and security for companies already using AI.

We integrate AI, copilot and agent risks into the cybersecurity GAP, control implementation and ongoing advisory cycle.

Problem

AI is already inside the company, often without governance.

Teams start using AI tools to accelerate operations, development, support or analysis. Risk appears when there is no shared criteria on which data can be used, who approves vendors, how critical use cases are documented or what happens after an incident.

AI tools are used without policy or clear owners.

Customer data or sensitive information may be shared without shared criteria.

Vendors, copilots and agents with system access are not inventoried.

Enterprise customers may ask questions the company is not ready to answer.

Solution

AI belongs in the company's existing risk and control model.

Talsoft brings AI tools, data, vendors and agents into the initial assessment, implementation roadmap and ongoing review. Scope is agreed around real systems and use cases, without promising a separate audit or certification.

GAP: inventory of tools, agents, data, vendors and existing controls.

Implementation: usage rules, data protection and access appropriate to each use case.

Agents: action boundaries, human approval where appropriate and reviewable records.

Continuity: follow-up on changes, risks and evidence within the Maturity Program.

AI-Safe Adoption

Three different questions, one risk-management approach.

Scope depends on how each company actually uses AI. We start by understanding which tools and agents exist, what information they use and which actions they can take.

AI Governance

Who decides which uses are allowed?

Inventory of use cases and vendors, owners, data criteria and documented decisions.

AI Security

Which information and systems could be exposed?

Review of access, data handling, integrations and security controls relevant to the solution.

AI Agent Security

What can an agent do on the company's behalf?

Action scope, least-privilege access, human approval where appropriate, activity records and change review.

For example, a copilot processing internal documents needs data rules; an agent connected to the CRM needs limited permissions and activity review.

Methodological references, not certifications offered

We use these sources as guidance according to project scope. Talsoft does not certify ISO/IEC 42001 or promise automatic compliance.

In summary

What it is

We integrate AI, copilot and agent risks into the cybersecurity GAP, control implementation and ongoing advisory cycle.

Who it is for

SMBs, startups, SaaS and fintechs under customer, audit, cyber insurance, growth or evidence pressure.

Main deliverables

  • Initial inventory of tools, agents and use cases.
  • AI risk matrix.
  • AI acceptable-use policy.

What it does not promise

It does not promise total security, certification, audit approval, insurance approval or absence of incidents.

How this connects to the Talsoft Operating Model

When prioritized gaps must become real controls.

  1. Priorities
  2. Controls
  3. Artifacts
  4. Evidence
  5. Validation
  6. Operation

Implementation leaves sustainable controls, accountable owners and reusable evidence.

Trust reference

Rivkin Securities case: ISMS, evidence and sustained operations.

Talsoft supported Rivkin Securities in Australia through a six-month program to formalize its cybersecurity structure, including an ISO 27001-aligned ISMS, live risk register, incident response, centralized monitoring and external PenTest.

View Rivkin case
  • Named case with a public CTO testimonial from Rivkin Securities.
  • Relevant for companies facing audit pressure, enterprise customers or international expansion.
  • The focus was not promising certification: it was organizing posture, execution, measurement and evidence.

Published testimonials

Client experiences working with Talsoft

Short references on professionalism, communication and support in cybersecurity work. Every project depends on its scope, context and objectives.

“Excellent service, very professional, with fast and clear responses.”
Simple SolutionsClient company
“Communication was fast and contacting Talsoft was easy.”
Carlos BergiaSysAdmin, Webcentrix S.A.
“The service is very detailed and the report is clear. Very good report.”
EdeaClient company
“Speed, efficiency and results.”
Aconpy SASClient company

Testimonials are qualitative references. They do not imply guaranteed outcomes or replace a context-specific assessment.

Feedback patterns

What clients tend to value when working with Talsoft.

Client comments reinforce a core idea: the value is not only finding risks, but explaining priorities, being available and turning findings into concrete next steps.

Clear action plan

Feedback highlights audits and assessments that end with concrete workstreams and improvements to implement.

Fast communication

Comments repeatedly mention clear responses, fluid contact and easy coordination during the project.

Availability under pressure

Several comments value team involvement when there was operational pressure or an active security issue.

Understandable reports

Feedback references detailed and clear reports that help business and technical teams understand what to do next.

Talsoft publishes qualitative patterns and short testimonials. Logos, metrics, architectures and sensitive details are not published without explicit authorization.

Free entry point

Not sure whether you need a full GAP assessment? Start with the free mini assessment.

The mini assessment is separate from booking a call. Answer a few questions to get an initial reading and decide whether a deeper review makes sense.

  • You can complete it without booking a meeting.
  • Get initial signals and a suggested next step.
  • If you already have an urgent request, you can book directly.

How it works

1

Step 1

We review tools, agents, use cases, involved data and external pressure.

2

Step 2

We classify risks by impact, data sensitivity and process criticality.

3

Step 3

We define rules, permissions, oversight, owners and next steps connected to the maturity roadmap.

Deliverables

Initial inventory of tools, agents and use cases.

AI risk matrix.

AI acceptable-use policy.

RACI for approval and follow-up.

Vendor and data checklist.

Agent access and oversight criteria, when agents are in use.

Benefits

Less informal AI use with sensitive data.

Clearer rules for technical and business teams.

Better answers to enterprise customer AI questions.

Practical rules without blocking legitimate adoption.

Initial evidence for audits or third-party reviews.

Connection with the Annual Program and Continuous Security Management.

Business impact

AI adoption needs judgment before bureaucracy.

The goal is not to block AI or promise absence of risk. It is to know what the company allows, limits, monitors and can evidence.

Reduces isolated tool decisions.

Organizes allowed and restricted data.

Improves customer and leadership conversations.

Prepares continuity if AI usage scales.

Author and reviewer: Leandro Ferrari · Last reviewed: 2026-10-19 · Version 1.0.0. This content is informational and does not guarantee certification, compliance or external approval.

Frequently asked questions

Does this replace legal advice on AI?

No. Talsoft organizes cybersecurity risks, controls and evidence; specific legal or regulatory matters should be validated with appropriate advisors.

Does it help if we only use ChatGPT or copilots?

Yes. Common tools can still create risk when data criteria, permissions and use cases are unclear.

Does it guarantee safe AI usage?

No. It reduces improvisation and organizes controls, but does not eliminate risk or guarantee external outcomes.

Does Talsoft certify ISO/IEC 42001?

No. The standard can inform the approach when relevant, but Talsoft is not a certification body and does not promise certification.

Validate the next step with clarity.

The first step is not buying another tool. It is understanding which risk exists, which evidence is missing and what decision should be made now.