Talsoft TS
Talsoft service

Penetration Testing for companies tied to the roadmap

Technical validation for SMBs and startups that need clear scope, prioritized findings, remediation and evidence connected to the Maturity Program.

Problem

An isolated PenTest can produce a report that is hard to execute.

The real value appears when scope is defined with business context and findings connect to owners, remediation, re-testing and evidence.

Scope is defined only by commercial urgency.

Critical findings have no clear owner.

Fixes are disconnected from baseline controls.

Re-test or closure evidence is not planned.

Solution

PenTest with scope, remediation and roadmap.

Talsoft defines the right level based on assets, exposure, external pressure, permissions, test window and remediation capacity.

Scope intake before proposal.

Technical report and executive summary.

Prioritization by criticality, exploitability and context.

Remediation plan and follow-up evidence.

In summary

What it is

Technical validation for SMBs and startups that need clear scope, prioritized findings, remediation and evidence connected to the Maturity Program.

Who it is for

SMBs, startups, SaaS and fintechs under customer, audit, cyber insurance, growth or evidence pressure.

Main deliverables

  • Defined scope and priority criteria.
  • Map of relevant gaps and risks.
  • Actionable recommendations.

What it does not promise

It does not promise total security, certification, audit approval, insurance approval or absence of incidents.

When PenTest makes sense

Applies when

  • Assets, permissions, test window and business objective are clear.
  • The company can assign owners to remediate findings.
  • Technical evidence is needed for customers, audits or roadmap.

Does not apply when

  • Critical assets and baseline controls are unclear.
  • There is no capacity to remediate after the report.
  • The PenTest is expected to replace a maturity program.

PenTest levels, always connected to remediation.

Talsoft does not position PenTesting as an isolated report. The right level depends on business objective, external pressure, current maturity and remediation capacity.

Minimum checklist before defining scope

If any of these points is unclear, it may be better to start with GAP or a scope conversation before confirming the PenTest.

Download scope checklist

Objective

Customer, audit, technical validation, re-test, external exposure or internal prioritization.

Assets

URLs, APIs, ranges, applications, cloud environments, mobile or infrastructure to assess.

Permissions

Authorization, rules of engagement, test window, contacts and operational restrictions.

Remediation

Responsible team, correction capacity, expected evidence and re-test criteria.

Conditions for a healthy scope

  • An internal owner can approve scope, permissions and test window.
  • A technical contact is available during the test for incidents or execution questions.
  • The company can prioritize and remediate findings after the report.
  • The objective is connected to a customer, audit, roadmap, cyber insurance or real exposure reduction.

What PenTesting should not promise

  • It does not guarantee absence of vulnerabilities or absence of incidents.
  • It does not replace a maturity program, readiness or ongoing risk management.
  • It should not run without authorization, rules of engagement and approved scope.

PenTest Starter

For startups or SMBs that need to validate a limited surface, respond to an initial requirement or prioritize critical findings.

Web/API or limited external perimeter, executive summary, prioritized findings and initial remediation plan.

PenTest Pro

For companies with broader exposure, enterprise customer pressure or multiple assets requiring deeper validation and stronger evidence.

Web/API, perimeter, cloud or infrastructure based on scope, executive/technical report and remediation follow-up.

Red Team Lite

For more mature organizations that need to validate business-impact scenarios, detection and response in a controlled way.

Focused exercise, defined objectives, rules of engagement, actionable findings and executive risk interpretation.

Possible scopes

Web applications

Validation of exposure in applications, portals and critical flows.

APIs

Review of endpoints, authentication, authorization and data exposure.

Infrastructure

Assessment of exposed surface, configuration and relevant technical risks.

Cloud

Review of cloud configurations and controls when environment and permissions allow it.

Mobile

Possible mobile application scope based on technology and objective.

Red/Purple Team

Advanced exercises recommended only with enough maturity and a clear objective.

Pricing is not published on the website. Every scope is confirmed before proposal, based on assets, permissions, test window, required depth and business objective.

Trust reference

Rivkin Securities case: ISMS, evidence and sustained operations.

Talsoft supported Rivkin Securities in Australia through a six-month program to formalize its cybersecurity structure, including an ISO 27001-aligned ISMS, live risk register, incident response, centralized monitoring and external PenTest.

View Rivkin case
  • Named case with a public CTO testimonial from Rivkin Securities.
  • Relevant for companies facing audit pressure, enterprise customers or international expansion.
  • The focus was not promising certification: it was organizing posture, execution, measurement and evidence.

Published testimonials

Client experiences working with Talsoft

Short references on professionalism, communication and support in cybersecurity work. Every project depends on its scope, context and objectives.

"Their assessment was sharp, detailed, and refreshingly easy to act on. We came away more secure and far better informed. Exactly the expertise we were hoping for."
Esteban SolerCTO, CrossCHQ
"Leandro and the team did a great job enhancing and formalising our existing security structure. The engagement was well-organised, consistently documented, and delivered to a high standard."
CTORivkin Securities
"They carried out a penetration testing activity professionally."
EMM S.A.Client company
"The service is very detailed and the report is clear. Very good report."
EdeaClient company

Testimonials are qualitative references. They do not imply guaranteed outcomes or replace a context-specific assessment.

Feedback patterns

What clients tend to value when working with Talsoft.

Client comments reinforce a core idea: the value is not only finding risks, but explaining priorities, being available and turning findings into concrete next steps.

Clear action plan

Feedback highlights audits and assessments that end with concrete workstreams and improvements to implement.

Fast communication

Comments repeatedly mention clear responses, fluid contact and easy coordination during the project.

Availability under pressure

Several comments value team involvement when there was operational pressure or an active security issue.

Understandable reports

Feedback references detailed and clear reports that help business and technical teams understand what to do next.

Talsoft publishes qualitative patterns and short testimonials. Logos, metrics, architectures and sensitive details are not published without explicit authorization.

Free entry point

Not sure whether you need a full GAP assessment? Start with the free mini assessment.

When booking, you complete a short questionnaire. Based on that input, Talsoft prepares a first read and a mini diagnostic report to orient the next step without over-scoping the decision.

  • Short pre-booking questionnaire.
  • Mini diagnostic report with signals and suggested next step.
  • Initial orientation without promising an audit, certification or guaranteed compliance.

How it works

1

Step 1

We review context, external pressure, assets and available evidence.

2

Step 2

We identify gaps, risks and pending decisions.

3

Step 3

We deliver prioritized next steps connected to the roadmap.

Deliverables

Defined scope and priority criteria.

Map of relevant gaps and risks.

Actionable recommendations.

Evidence or artifacts defined by service scope.

Executive summary for leadership.

Next steps connected to the Maturity Program.

Benefits

Clearer decisions on what to do first.

Better conversations with customers and auditors.

Less dependence on isolated urgency.

More organized evidence.

Stronger alignment between business and IT.

A foundation for ongoing advisory support.

Business impact

The value is in the decision it enables.

An isolated cybersecurity service can produce a report. A maturity-connected service produces criteria, evidence and execution sequence.

Reduces ambiguity around priorities.

Exposes accepted or pending risks.

Prepares third-party conversations without improvisation.

Keeps progress moving after the deliverable.

Frequently asked questions

When should we run a PenTest?

When assets, permissions, business objective and remediation capacity are clear.

When should we start with GAP?

When critical assets, baseline controls, owners or remediation capacity are unclear.

Does a PenTest guarantee absence of incidents?

No. It is a point-in-time validation inside a broader risk management program.

Validate the next step with clarity.

The first step is not buying another tool. It is understanding which risk exists, which evidence is missing and what decision should be made now.